When using '[ci:skip-build]' without any changed packages, do not
attempt to run "pmbootstrap checksum" without any package arguments.
This may happen, because CI in MRs runs across all patches in the MR,
but CI on branches (master, v20.05) only run on the last commit.
Prevents CI failures like this one:
https://gitlab.com/postmarketOS/pmaports/-/commit/9a48b41a2362ba0dd2b0901cae966011b37d1856
Flashing linux-postmarketos-exynos4 to the i9100 requires pmbootstrap MR
1986.
[ci:skip-vercheck]: linux-samsung-i9300: 3.0.101-r1 instead of -r0 is
not a mistake, the linting error fixes are in a separate commit with
their own pkgrel bump. I decided to leave that in its own commit instead
of squashing together with the other commit (as we usually do), because
the linting fixes are quite a lot and it makes the log more readable.
[ci:skip-build]: already built successfully in CI
The existing device package and its dependencies are for i9305, but
renaming them to i9300 makes more sense, as the i9300 is the base
version (SIII) and the i9305 (SIII LTE) is the improved version.
The devices supported by this package are Galaxy S3 (GT-I9300, GT-I9305,
SHV-E210K/L/S) and the Galaxy Note 2 (GT-N7100, GT-N7105) - a family of
boards also known by the codename "Midas" - and the Galaxy S2 (GT-I9100)
From this list, only the i9100 doesn't support the bootimg method.
Because of this, this kernel package is using the isorec method for all
the devices on the list. Additionally, for the midas devices, there is
no problem with this because the boot.img file is, in fact, a copy of
the kernel+initramfs on the pmos boot partition and what the isorec
initramfs does is actually to load the initramfs on that partition
directly (at least on my understanding).
Currently phosh is broken in postmarketOS edge. Fork wlroots from Alpine
and revert the new consistency check that results in the breakage. I've
submitted the same to Alpine, but let's get it in pmOS now so it is
fixed ASAP.
Alpine MR: https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/merge_requests/14522
[ci:skip-vercheck]: new package added with -r1 on purpose
Removed 2 actions cause future suspends to trigger a kernel bug that
ends up spamming the kernel log with "ehci-platform 1c1b000.usb: port 1
resume error -110" and eventually makes the device not respond to any
input or hang in shutdown/reboot.
Workaround for issue: #848
Co-Authored-By: Oliver Smith <ollieparanoid@postmarketos.org>
Since the installer leaves the partition in a state where the initramfs
needs to resize it. But without the force parameter the postmarketOS
initramfs won't touch the partitions
Mostly the GCC10 yylloc failure was seen but several others have been
observed:
* wireguard script was silently failing
* several gcc10 x86 errors
* a checksum from kernel.org has changed
Now we have 3 different gcc10 yylloc patches:
gcc10-extern_YYLOC_global_declaration.patch:
Linux < 4.2
linux4.2-gcc10-extern_YYLOC_global_declaration.patch:
Linux 4.2+
linux4.17-gcc10-extern_YYLOC_global_declaration.patch:
Linux 4.17+
[ci:skip-build]
[ci:ignore-count]
[ci:skip-vercheck]
Use the dtb-appended kernel file, e.g. postmarketos-exynos4-dtb instead
of postmarketos-exynos4, if it is available. This is needed to flash a
mainline kernel with appended dtb to isorec devices.
With these kernel sources the device boots successfully,
sometimes. Usually, kernel panics and device reboots a couple of
times, but after a few attempts (maybe 1, maybe 7) it succeeds to
boot. The problems seem to be related to FIMC IS, unfortunately it
does not seem to be possible to just disable it in the kernel config,
as that leads to compilation errors.
I have so far just experimented with getting wifi up and running, but
it does not work out of the box even after adding firmware package
with files from TheMuppets, wpa_supplicant fails to connect and dmesg
is filed with lines like:
```
[ 112.509235] [L0: wl_event_handle: 3109] CFG80211-INFO2) wl_escan_handler : Couldn't find P2PIE in probe response/beacon
```
[ci:skip-build]: already built successfully in CI
plasma-nano (albeit saying it is 5.20.1) is pointing to the master branch
and kept as-is (there is no updates in master and I don't see a reason to
downgrade it to the actual 5.20.2 tag which is a few small commits behind
the master).
Timothee LF